Thus far, the case has proceeded roughly as one might expect based on SG Olsen's opening statement. Testimony by witnesses for the plaintiffs has focused on the emotional harm that the witnesses feel as a result of not having their views regarding same sex marriage legally validated by the state constitution. For those interested in more closely following the case, further information can be found at other blogs on the internet. In particular, there is the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) blog here -
http://www.adfmedia.org/News/PRDetail/3618
There's also an interesting piece on the "vote again until you get it right" mentality that seems to pervade the minds of those who support same-sex marriage at this location here -
http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/01/12/the-prop-8-trial-and-the-new-theory-of-politics/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment moderation is on.